TRADE AND INDUSTRY

Energy Council

Brian Wilson: I represented the UK at the Energy Council, Brussels on 14 May 2003.
	The Council considered several matters of interest for the UK. Chief among these were the Cogeneration Directive, the follow-up to the World Summit on Sustainable Development and the Commission's proposals and draft directives on EU level oil and gas stocks and security of supply.
	A compromise text for a Directive on Cogeneration (combined heat and power), which reflects UK objectives, was adopted after reserves (including the UK) were lifted. The European Commission described the important points as being the need to concentrate on high-quality schemes delivering good energy savings with safeguards against market distortions. Whilst Member States agreed to the text, some signalled a desire for a more ambitious measure at a later stage.
	The debate on the follow-up to the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) centred on whether existing Community measures were sufficient to meet targets for greenhouse gas emissions, and on the long-term future of renewable energy. There was support for the outcome of the Johannesburg WSSD and recognition that the EU must take the lead in developing a sustainable energy policy. Most felt that the existing Community instruments would need assessing in about one year. On the future of renewables, the general view was that there needed to be a broadening of the technological base: wind technology alone was unlikely to deliver all the savings needed; effort was needed to develop biomass, solar and clean coal technology.
	The Commission thought that, whereas the EU appeared to be in the lead on energy efficiency, progress in the EU on renewables had been good, but could be better; and stressed the need for realism towards developing countries in respect of their capacity to switch to non-fossil fuels along with the need for developed countries to provide technological help to discourage growth in fossil fuel use.
	The UK said that the main need was for greater use of market-based mechanisms to incentivise investments in more novel forms of renewable energy such as wave and tidal power, biomass and solar. The UK underlined the need to encourage development of cleaner coal technology—particularly relevant to developing countries, with whom dialogue should be stepped up.
	On oil stocks, most Member States opposed the Commission's proposals to increase emergency oil stocking levels and give the Commission a greater role in co-ordinating a response to disruption of world oil supplies. They shared the UK view that oil is a global market, that any response to disruption needs to be co-ordinated on a global basis, and that only the International Energy Agency (IEA) can do this. Recent events had shown that the existing IEA arrangements worked well and there was no need to change them.
	On gas stocks, most opposed the Commission's proposals, giving the Commission wide new powers over the use of gas stocks in the event of potential supply disruptions. The UK saw merit in increased transparency and minimum security standards, provided they did not result in additional costs. But long-term contracts were a matter for companies—subject to EU competition rules. Some accession states (present for the first time at an Energy Council) endorsed the need for common measures on supply security, but expressed concern over the cost of larger stocks.
	Discussion on International Energy Relations focused on the EU/Russia dialogue and the energy forum scheduled for Amsterdam in May 2004. Delegates emphasised the need to prepare carefully for the EU/Russia Summit on 31 May in St. Petersburg, and the need to promote a consumer/producer dialogue and to encourage Russia to accede to the Kyoto protocol and Energy Charter Treaty.
	Following agreement on a Commission request for the inclusion of a reference to the negotiating mandate for a nuclear co-operation agreement with Russia currently in the Council Working Group, Council conclusions were adopted.
	Italy concluded by indicating that it would take forward the work of the Greek Presidency. Its priorities will be EU/Russia, Euro-Med and South East Europe/Balkans relations, particularly the need to develop further gas supply partnerships.

FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS

Council of the European Union

Denis MacShane: The forthcoming business in the Council of the European Union from June to December 2003 is as follows:
	
		
			 Date Location Event 
		
		
			 JUNE   
			 2 Brussels EUROGROUP 
			 2–3 Brussels Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs 
			 2–3 Alexandroupolis Development Co-operation (Ministerial Informal) 
			 3 Brussels ECOFIN  
			 4 Brussels Meeting of the Presidium 
			 5–6 Brussels Convention Plenary 
			 5–6 Brussels Transport, Telecom and Energy Council 
			 5–6 Brussels Justice and Home Affairs Council 
			 6 Rhodes Public Administration (Ministerial Informal) 
			 9 London Chancellor's statement to the House of Commons on the UK's euro decision 
			 11 Brussels Meeting of the Presidium 
			 11–12 Brussels Agriculture and Fisheries Council 
			 12–13 Brussels Convention Plenary 
			 13 Brussels Environment Council 
			 17–18 Luxembourg General Affairs and External Relations 
			 20 Halkidiki European Council 
			 21 Halkidiki Zagreb 11 Summit 
			 24 Brussels General Affairs and External Relations (GAERC) 
			 JULY   
			 2–3 Rome Research (Ministerial Informal) 
			 4–5 Naples Transport Infrastructure (Ministerial Informal) 
			 6 Palermo Trade (Ministerial Informal) 
			 11–12 Varese Employment and Social Policy (Informal Council) 
			 15–16 Brussels ECOFIN 
			 17–18 Treviso EU Employment Committee (Informal) 
			 18–20 Montecatini Energy and Environment (Ministerial Informal) 
			 22–23 Brussels Agriculture and Fisheries Council 
			 22 Brussels General Affairs and External Relations 
			 24–25 Milan European Conference on Competitiveness (Informal Ministerial) 
			 25–26 Rome European Conference on Competitiveness (Informal Ministerial) 
			 25–26 Verona Education (and Research?) (Ministerial Informal) 
			 AUGUST  
			  No meetings planned 
			 SEPTEMBER   
			 3–4 Viterbo Telecommunications (Ministerial) 
			 5–6 Riva del Garda Gymnich (Informal Foreign Affairs) 
			 7–9 Taormina Agriculture (Informal Council) 
			
			 12–13 Stresa ECOFIN (Informal Council) 
			 19–20 Rome Justice and Internal Affairs (Informal Council) 
			 22–23 Brussels Competition (Internal Market, Industry and Research) 
			 26–27 Erice Community regional Cohesion Policy (Ministerial Informal) 
			 29–30 Brussels General Affairs and External Relations 
			 29–30 Brussels Agriculture and Fisheries Council 
			 OCTOBER   
			 2–3 Brussels Justice and Internal Affairs 
			
			 3–4 Rome Defence (Ministerial Informal) 
			 7 Brussels ECOFIN 
			 9–10 Brussels Transport, Telecom and Energy Council 
			 13–14 Brussels General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) 
			 13–14 Brussels Agriculture and Fisheries Council 
			 16–17 Brussels European Council 
			 20–21 Brussels Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council 
			 27 Brussels Environment Council 
			 NOVEMBER   
			 4 Brussels ECOFIN 
			 6 Brussels Justice and Internal Affairs (Informal Council—to be confirmed) 
			 17–18 Brussels General Affairs and External Relations 
			 17–18 Brussels Agriculture and Fisheries Council 
			 24–25 Brussels ECOFIN 
			 24–25 Brussels Education, Youth and Culture Council 
			 27–28 Brussels Justice and Internal Affairs (Informal Council) 
			 DECEMBER   
			 1–2 Naples Euromed Meeting 
			 1–2 Brussels Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs 
			 1–12 Milan Climate and sustainable Development Conference 
			 4–5 Brussels Transport, Telecom and Energy Council 
			 4–5 Rome Closing Conference for the European Year of the Disabled 
			 8–9 Brussels General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) 
			 12–13 Brussels European Council 
			 15–17 Brussels Agriculture and Fisheries Council 
			 16 Brussels ECOFIN 
			 17–18 Brussels Environment Council